|
+ Play
Audio
|
+ Download Audio | +
Email to a friend | +
Join mailing list
Sept.
14, 2007: "Fasten your seat belts," says
Alan Stern, associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission
Directorate. "One of NASA's most amazing programs is
about to get even better."
He's
talking about Discovery--the adventurous NASA program that
gave us the first rover on another planet (Mars Pathfinder),
the first landing on an asteroid (NEAR's touchdown on 433
Eros), the first sample return from a comet (Stardust), the
first sample return from the Sun (Genesis) and the possible
discovery of water at the Moon's poles (Lunar Prospector).
Right:
Mars Pathfinder's Sojourner rover. [More]
"The
Discovery program has been a spectacular success, more than
anyone bargained for," he says. "Now we're looking
to expand it. In the coming year, we're going to start planning
dramatic improvements in the kind of missions we can undertake."
Any
hints? "No," says Stern. "We're still studying
our options. This is just a teaser."
Listen
carefully, however, and you might catch some clues leaking
out at the Discovery@15 conference held Sept. 19-20 at the
Marshall Space Flight Center.
"We're
getting together to commemorate the 15th anniversary of the
Discovery program," explains program scientist Michael
New of NASA Headquarters. "Dozens of scientists, engineers,
professors and students will converge on Huntsville, Alabama,
to review past successes, share lessons learned and to plan
the next wave of missions." New and Stern are keynote
speakers at the event.

Above:
Click
to view the conference agenda.
"When
we started the Discovery program 15 years ago, we weren't
sure it would work," says New. "Now we know: it's
a great way to explore the solar system."
What's
different about Discovery?
Consider
the traditional way of doing business: "Before Discovery,
NASA would announce a 'Big Mission'—sending the Viking Landers
to Mars, for instance, or the Voyagers to tour the outer planets.
NASA would figure out what to do and how to do it, and invite
the scientific community to participate." Traditional
missions tend to be expensive and sweeping in scope, able
to investigate a wide-range of scientific questions. The Cassini
mission, for instance, dropped a lander on Titan, studies
the dynamics of Saturn's rings, monitors Saturnian weather
and much more. "Some great science has been done this
way," New says.
But
Discovery takes a different tack. "Instead of announcing
a Big Mission and expecting everyone to fall in line, we now
ask researchers what do you want to do? They submit
proposals for relatively inexpensive ($425 million cost cap),
fast turn-around missions (launches happen every 24 months)
to destinations of their choice." Typical competitions
pit a few dozen proposals against one another, and only the
most highly-ranked are approved. "After a proposal is
accepted, it is the scientist who leads the mission while
NASA offers support—a major role reversal."
"This
approach unleashes a tidal wave of ingenuity and curiosity,"
says New.
When
asked to name the top five accomplishments of the Discovery
Program so far, New and Stern came up with nine different
answers. "There's so much to choose from," says
New.
Both
agreed on one: The discovery of "refractory inclusions"
in dust from Comet Wild 2. In plain language, samples of Wild
2 returned to Earth by the Stardust spacecraft harbor chemical
evidence that the cold, icy comet may have formed surprisingly
close to the Sun--or alternately that material close to the
Sun mysteriously traveled to the cold outer reaches of the
solar system and peppered young Comet Wild 2 with Earth-like
minerals. Either way, this upends traditional ideas of how
the solar system was born.
Right:
Each of these tracks in aerogel contains a particle from Comet
Wild 2. The extraterrestrial samples were returned to Earth
by the Stardust spacecraft. [More]
Both
also agreed that Lunar Prospector was a top five accomplishment—but
for different reasons: Stern credits Lunar Prospector with
the discovery of hydrogen-rich material--think H2O--at
the Moon's poles. "There may be water there for future
explorers," Stern says. On the other hand, New argues
that "Lunar Prospector's most important discovery is
the Moon's chemical asymmetry." About 30% of the Moon's
nearside is covered with "KREEP"—a mixture of Potassium
(K), rare earth elements (REE) and phosphorus (P). The other
~70% of the surface is not. "This challenges a long-held
idea: When the Moon was very young, it was supposed to have
been covered by a global ocean of magma, well mixed and uniform
all around. Eventually, the magma cooled to form the Moon's
solid surface—or so the theory goes." But why would a
well-mixed ocean deposit KREEP in some places and not in others?
Could our ideas of lunar genesis be so wrong? "It's a
real puzzle."
New
rounded out his top-5 choices with Mars Pathfinder ("a
new paradigm for landing on Mars"), Deep Impact ("the
first mission to blow a hole in a comet") and NEAR's
exploration of 433 Eros ("we orbited and landed on a
near-Earth asteroid").
Stern
notes that before reaching 433 Eros, NEAR flew by asteroid
Mathilda and gathered surprising evidence of "macro-porosity"—in
other words, Mathilda is full of big holes. How did it get
that way? "We don't know," says Stern, "but
this is the kind of information we need in case we ever have
to deflect or destroy an incoming space rock."
Stern's
top five ends with comets: When Stardust and Deep Impact flew
past their respective targets, cameras recorded surprising
new kinds of comet-terrain including craggy cliffs, icy spires,
strange "sedimentary" layers and powdery flows.
"It's nothing short of mind-boggling."
And
this program is about to get better? Fasten your seat belts,
indeed.
SEND
THIS STORY TO A FRIEND
Author: Dr.
Tony Phillips | Production Editor:
Dr. Tony Phillips | Credit: Science@NASA
|