Much ado about Pluto

Space Science News home
Much ado about Pluto
Recent discoveries of Pluto-like objects in the outer
solar system have sparked debate about the nature of the tiniest
"planet"
Feb 17, 1999: In 1979 the
Solar System became a bit mixed up. That's when Pluto, which
travels in a highly elliptical orbit, temporarily moved closer
to the sun than Neptune. Every 248 years the two planets swap
places and for about 20 years Pluto becomes the eighth planet
and Neptune the ninth. This topsy-turvy situation was rectified
last Thursday, Feb. 11, when Pluto crossed Neptune's orbit and
became the ninth planet once again.
Right: Pluto is the only planet that has not been visited
by a spacecraft. Even the Hubble Space Telescope can resolve
only the largest features on its surface, shown in this image
of one hemisphere. The brightness variations could be due to
craters and basins, methane and nitrogen frosts, or even areas
of primordial organic matter. No one knows, and the mystery may
remain until some future spacecraft pays a visit to this distant
planet. More
information
One of these things is not like the others
But is Pluto really a planet? That's what astronomers have been discussing since late last year when some members of the International Astronomical Union suggested that Pluto be given a minor planet designation. Why? For one thing Pluto is very small. It's 6 times smaller than Earth, and even smaller than seven of the solar system's moons (the Moon, Io, Europa, Ganymede, Callisto, Titan and Triton). Pluto's own moon, Charon, is larger in proportion to its planet than any other satellite in the solar system. Some astronomers consider the pair to be a double planet.
December 3: Mars Polar Lander nears touchdown December 2: What next, Leonids? November 30: Polar Lander Mission Overview November 30: Learning how to make a clean sweep in space |
Pluto's composition is unknown, but its density (about 2 gm/cm3) indicates that it is probably a mixture of rock and ice. All the other rocky planets -- Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars -- are located in the inner solar system, close to the Sun. Except for Pluto, all of the outer planets -- Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune -- are gaseous giants. Once again, Pluto is a misfit.
Pluto behind the 8 ball
Despite its well-known peculiarities, Pluto's official status
as a planet was never in jeopardy until 1992 when David Jewitt
and J. Luu discovered a curious object called 1992 QB1. QB1 is
a small icy body, similar in size to an asteroid, orbiting 1.5
times further from the sun than Neptune. QB1 was the first hint
that there might be more than just Pluto in the distant reaches
of the solar system.
Right: Kuiper Belt object 1995 WY2
observed UT 1995 Nov 18 using the Keck 10 meter telescope by
D. Jewitt (University of Hawaii) and J. Luu (University of California,
Berkeley). These are the discovery images. Each is a 900 second
integration. The images are separated by about 18 minutes, during
which time the object moves 1 arcsecond. Stationary background
galaxies are also evident in this short movie. The apparent magnitude
is V = 24.2. For more information see David Jewitt's Kuiper
Belt Home Page.
Since then nearly 100 objects like QB1 have been found. They
are thought to be similar to Pluto in composition and, like Pluto,
many orbit the sun in a 3:2 resonance with Neptune. This swarm
of Pluto-like objects beyond Neptune is known as the Kuiper Belt,
after Gerard Kuiper, who first proposed that such a belt existed
and served as a source of short period comets. Astronomers estimate
that there are at least 35,000 Kuiper Belt objects greater than
100 km in diameter, which is several hundred times the number
(and mass) of similar sized objects in the main asteroid belt.
![]() Sign up for our EXPRESS SCIENCE NEWS delivery |
Other than its relatively large size, Pluto is practically indistinguishable from the Kuiper Belt objects (KBOs) and short period comets. The main difference is Pluto's reflectivity, which is much higher than that of known KBOs. "Pluto has a higher albedo (60%) than we suspect for the other KBOs," explains Dr. David Jewitt of the University of Hawaii. "But this is an artifact of size - Pluto has enough mass & gravity to retain a tenuous atmosphere from which bright surface frosts may be deposited on the surface."
David Jewitt and his colleagues at the Institute for Astronomy are leaders in the search for new members of the Kuiper Belt. They are presently scanning a 50 sq. degree area of the sky for KBO's using the University of Hawaii's 8192 x 8192 pixel CCD camera, and are experimenting with an even larger 12,000 x 8,000 pixel camera for faster searches. So far their efforts have met with considerable success. They have discovered over 40 KBO's in recent years, some of which are comparable in size to Pluto.
"We've already found objects 1/3rd the diameter of Pluto," says David Jewitt," even though we have examined only a tiny fraction of the sky. An example is 1996 TO66, which is 800 km diameter. It would be incredible in its own right if Pluto proved to be the only 2000 km object. I think we'll have Pluto II, Pluto III....within a few years."
Right: Artist's conception of the
Pluto-Kuiper
Express, a spacecraft that NASA planners hope will visit
Pluto and Charon around 2010. Pluto is the only planet in our
Solar System not yet viewed close-up by spacecraft. As a result
many basic questions about Pluto remain unanswered. For example,
what are the mysterious dark patches revealed in Hubble images
of Pluto? Could they be due to photochemical reactions caused
by cosmic rays, or perhaps areas of primordial organic matter?
Does Charon, like Pluto, have dark spots and an atmosphere? Or
is it a very different kind of body? Mission planners hope to
answer these questions and many more. Depending on the success
of the Pluto-Charon encounter, the space probe could go on to
visit objects in the Kuiper Belt.
Nine's a charm
Dr. Jewitt raises the interesting possibility that Kupier
Belt objects might one day be discovered that are even larger
than our ninth planet. If that happens, what does it mean for
Pluto? Should it be stripped of planetary status and reclassified
as a member of the Kuiper Belt? Or should newly discovered "Plutos"
be classified as planets as well?
Left: A
Hubble telescope image of Pluto and its satellite Charon.
These are difficult questions that await the astronomical community.
For now, however, Pluto's status as a planet seems secure. In
a press release dated Feb. 3, 1999 the International Astronomical
Union stated that "No proposal to change the status of Pluto
as the ninth planet in the solar system has been made by any
Division, Commission or Working Group of the IAU responsible
for solar system science. Lately, a substantial number of smaller
objects have been discovered in the outer solar system, beyond
Neptune, with orbits and possibly other properties similar to
those of Pluto. It has been proposed to assign Pluto a number
in a technical catalogue or list of such Trans-Neptunian Objects
(TNOs) so that observations and computations concerning these
objects can be conveniently collated. This process was explicitly
designed to not change Pluto's status as a planet."
Mistaken reports that the IAU intended to strip Pluto of its
planetary status caused an uproar among astronomers and in the
popular press. It seems that Pluto is a sentimental favorite
to remain a planet among both scientists and the public. However,
if more trans-Neptunian objects are discovered that are even
larger than Pluto, the debate could begin anew.
IAU Press Release-- on the status of Pluto, Feb 3, 1999
A discussion of Pluto's status-- from Division III of the IAU. Includes "What is a planet?"
The Pluto-Kuiper Express-- a mission to explore Pluto/Charon and the fringes of our Solar System from JPL.
Facts about Pluto - from SEDS
Facts about the Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud - from SEDS
More Space Science Headlines - NASA research on the web
NASA's Office of Space Science press releases and other news related to NASA and astrophysics
More
Headlinesreturn to Space Science News Home
|
For more information, please contact: Dr. John M. Horack , Director of Science Communications |
Author: Dr.
Tony Phillips Curator: Linda Porter NASA Official: Ron Koczor |
