Planetary Waves Break Ozone Holes
Planetary Waves Break
Huge planet-girdling atmospheric waves suppress ozone
holes over Earth's northern hemisphere.
Why? New research confirms what scientists have long thought: Giant atmospheric waves spawned by land features such as the Himalayas damp the formation of a northern ozone hole and, as a result, Arctic cities remain safe from unwelcome doses of solar ultraviolet radiation -- at least for now. Researchers caution that climate change could undo the work of those waves and make Arctic ozone holes more common in the future.
Above: The towering Dhaulagiri Range of the Himalayas in central Nepal (shown here in a photo from the International Space Station) is a source of planet-girdling atmospheric waves that warm the stratosphere. [more]
The north-south difference is an indirect result of the way land is distributed around Earth -- that is, unevenly. Most of our planet's land and its highest mountains are in the northern hemisphere.
High mountains and land-sea boundaries combine to generate vast undulations in the atmosphere called "planetary-scale waves," or "long waves," which act to heat polar air. Planetary-scale waves are so large that some of them wrap around the whole Earth! Unlike water waves, which displace the water up and down, planetary waves displace air north and south as they travel around our planet. They form in the troposphere (the lowest part of the atmosphere) and propagate upward, transferring their energy to the stratosphere.
Stronger planetary waves in the northern hemisphere warm the Arctic stratosphere and suppress ozone destruction. Land forms in the southern hemisphere also produce planetary waves, but they tend to be weaker because there are fewer tall mountain ranges and more open ocean around Antarctica
Above: In years when planetary waves (or "long waves") in the Northern Hemisphere are unusually weak, an ozone hole can form over the Arctic. Blue and purple indicate regions of low stratospheric ozone.
"The Himalayan plateau is a terrific forcing function for these waves in the north," says Paul Newman, an atmospheric physicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. "If you didn't have the Himalayas, the stratosphere over the Arctic would be much colder than it is."
Newman was the lead author of a paper published last month which presents satellite and meteorological data linking planetary waves to bursts of warming registered in the Arctic -- a connection that scientists long-ago recognized but have only now quantified. (His paper appears in the Sept. 16 issue of Journal of Geophysical Research -- Atmospheres.)
"Typically a wave will warm the polar region by 5o to 10o C," Newman continued. "A 'warm' polar stratosphere is typically in the temperature range -73o to -63o C. Of course, as soon as the wave has dissipated, the polar region begins to cool down again."
Below: Dangerous beauty. Polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) are common in Antarctica, but a rare sight in the Arctic. They form when temperatures in the stratosphere become extremely cold -- below -78째 C. PSCs spell trouble for ozone; tiny ice crystals and droplets within the clouds provide surfaces where CFCs are converted into ozone-destroying molecules. Credit: Lamont Poole, NASA.
Indeed, planetary waves in the northern hemisphere don't always heat the stratosphere enough to prevent substantial ozone destruction. In 1997, for example, the waves were weak because of capricious weather. That triggered a rare springtime ozone hole over the Arctic.
Scientists are concerned that climate change could make such times more common. "If our models of Arctic stratospheric cooling are correct, we would expect lower ozone values across the Arctic during this century," says Newman.
It so happens that stratospheric cooling can be a curious result of global warming. Greenhouse gases, which trap the heat radiating from Earth's surface in the lowest layer of the atmosphere, reduce the heat that reaches the stratosphere. In effect, greenhouse gases cool the stratosphere by insulating it from the warmer Earth below.
Climate changes associated with global warming might also weaken planetary waves -- so say some computer models. The cooling of the stratosphere due to this indirect effect could be more significant than the cooling caused directly by greenhouse gases. However, Newman cautions that this result is still very uncertain because of questions about the fidelity of the computer models.since declined. Computer simulations show that CFCs in the high stratosphere could return to pre-1980 levels in 30 to 50 years. Because climate change occurs on similar time scales, it's difficult to say which trend would dominate: the cooling of the stratosphere, which would encourage an Arctic ozone hole, or the decline of CFCs, which would suppress it.
is the season when sunlight can trigger the chemistry of stratospheric
ozone destruction. But Earth's two poles react differently to
the coming of spring. Springtime in Antarctica heralds a large
ozone hole, while springtime in the Arctic (six months later)
often brings above-average ozone concentrations. Global warming
could alter this familiar pattern, though, by chilling the northern
stratosphere and producing an ozone hole there as well. [more]
Perhaps only time will tell if far-northern cities will continue to enjoy the good fortune of year-round polar ozone. But many researchers aren't content to wait decades for an answer. With the aid of Earth-watching satellites and ever-improving computer climate models, scientists hope to unravel the puzzle of Arctic ozone before it becomes a problem. After all, one planetary ozone hole is more than enough!
NASA Confirms Arctic Ozone Depletion Trigger -- (NASA/GSFC) Learn more about recent research connecting planetary waves to ozone depletion.
VIDEO:-- This 552 kB QuickTime animation of Arctic ozone concentrations shows the dynamic nature of air currents in the polar stratosphere. Animation courtesy NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.
Dawn of a New Ozone Hole -- Science@NASA article: Our planet's Antarctic ozone hole is opening once again as Spring approaches in the southern hemisphere.
Ozone Holes Like it Cold -- What's the connection between colder temperatures and ozone destruction? CFCs don't actually destroy ozone -- first they have to be converted into other forms that can directly attack ozone molecules. Part of this conversion process is catalyzed by the surfaces of tiny crystals and droplets in "polar stratospheric clouds." These clouds only form when temperatures in the stratosphere get extremely cold, below -78째 C.
Above: Dangerous beauty. Polar stratospheric clouds such as these are common in Antarctica, but a rare sight in the Arctic. Such clouds are "breeding grounds" for ozone-destroying molecules.
The Incredible Shrinking Ozone Hole -- Science@NASA article: After reaching record-breaking proportions earlier this year the ozone hole over Antarctica has made a surprisingly hasty retreat.
Peering Into the Ozone Hole -- Science@NASA article: Concentrations of ozone-destroying gases are down, but the Antarctic ozone hole is bigger than ever. It turns out there's more to ozone destruction than just CFCs.
Earth's Fidgeting Climate -- Science@NASA article: Is human activity warming the Earth or do recent signs of climate change signal natural variations? In this feature article, scientists discuss the vexing ambiguities of our planet's complex and unwieldy climate.
NASA's Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer -- Home page for the instrument, which takes daily snapshots of ozone concentrations and UV levels around the Earth.
Ozone and the Atmosphere -- a tutorial on Earth's present day atmosphere, ozone creation and depletion, and the complex interactions under study by scientists worldwide.
The Montreal Protocol of 1987 -- Text of The Montreal Protocol, which set provisions for phasing out the use of chemicals determined to hasten ozone destruction.
Join our growing list of subscribers - sign up for our express news delivery and you will receive a mail message every time we post a new story!!!